![]() ![]() I think the same argument would apply to a skirt if a girl was to be caned on the bottom, although I’ve never been wholly convinced that a typical school skirt would have been really tight against the lower part of the bottom even in a bending over position. In a standing position, there would be an air gap between the trousers and the bottom, which would impede a cane stroke. Surely the main reason for bending over for a school punishment was so that the trousers would tighten against the bottom. There may also be something in the idea of a caning being more painful if the skin is stretched but I would have thought that would also be influenced in a greater way by the thickness/amount of layers covering the bottom. I assume it is to make the bottom an easier target and help to avoid miss-hits. It generally presents a better target for the purpose of punishment although there is a case when the paddle is used that the recipient should be lying face down thereby presenting the bottom in a more relaxed state and perhaps better equipped to receive swats.īoys always had to bend over in my school. In the bending over position, it makes the fleshy lower part of the bottom more accessible for strokes of the cane. ![]() I suppose it would be effective in either position I know it was for me. I know at my school it was always administered with the culprit bending over the headmaster’s desk or a chair. I’m not sure why someone who is being punished should have to bend over to receive it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |